I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN

Phone: (8352) 62-08-71 ext. 1182, ext. 1184

redak_vestnik@chgpu.edu.ru

Index catalog Press of Russia: 39898

Metadata (abstracts and keywords) for the articles in the journal

T. Yu. Guryanova, E. L. Zaytseva, O. A. Bilan LEXICAL AND SEMANTIC MICROFIELD “D. TRUMP AS A PARTICIPANT IN THE 2020 US PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN” (IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA) // I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN. 2022. № 3(116). p. 20-26
Author(s):T. Yu. Guryanova, E. L. Zaytseva, O. A. Bilan
Index of UDK:81'371:[324:070](73)
Index of DOI:10.37972/chgpu.2022.116.3.003
Name of article:LEXICAL AND SEMANTIC MICROFIELD “D. TRUMP AS A PARTICIPANT IN THE 2020 US PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN” (IN THE AMERICAN MEDIA)
Keywords:

elections, President, evaluation, media, сoncept, discourse, Trump

Abstracts:

This article is devoted to the linguistic representation of the past presidential elections in the American media and is aimed at analyzing the linguistic facts in which the attitude towards the candidate for the US presidency, D. Trump, is manifested. Articles on presidential elections are always characterized by varying degrees of evaluativeness, i.e., in the conditions of competition between candidates and a certain limited number of voters, negative and positive evaluations of candidates are verbalized with the linguistic means that already have an evaluative component in the meaning, or the evaluation may arise contextually. Linguistic facts in which a negative attitude towards D. Trump is manifested numerically predominate in comparison with the examples in which D. Trump is evaluated positively. The evaluative side of the discourse of the presidential campaign manifests itself in the form of a paired structure, in which a negative evaluation of the dishonest/stupid/greedy D. Trump, his desire for profit with minimal verbal respect for him is presented in the discourse against the background of linguistic facts describing the competence/honesty/experience of J. Biden. The authors come to the conclusion that the negative attitude towards D. Trump during the election campaign is distinguished by the use of more diverse linguistic means compared to his positive evaluation.

The contact details of authors:

Гурьянова Татьяна Юрьевна – кандидат педагогических наук, доцент кафедры иностранных языков № 1 Чувашского государственного университета имени И. Н. Ульянова, г. Чебоксары, Россия, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3440-4479, vgurtat@yandex.ru

Зайцева Елена Львовна – кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры романо-германской филологии и переводоведения Чувашского государственного университета имени И. Н. Ульянова, г. Чебоксары, Россия, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2223-2956, 917elena@mail.ru

Билан Ольга Александровна – кандидат философских наук, доцент кафедры истории, философии, политологии и социологии Петербургского государственного университета путей сообщения Императора Александра I, г. Санкт-Петербург, Россия, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-2178, filosofia-bilan-olga@mail.ru

Pages:20-26
Full version of article:Download