I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN

Phone: (8352) 62-08-71 ext. 1182, ext. 1184

redak_vestnik@chgpu.edu.ru

Index catalog Press of Russia: 39898

Metadata (abstracts and keywords) for the articles in the journal

G.-R. A.-K. Guseinov PHONETIC FEATURES OF THE KIZLYAR SUBDIALECT OF THE TEREK DIALECT OF THE KUMYK LANGUAGE IN THE COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL AND AREAL CONTEXT // I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN. 2021. № 3(112). p. 18-24
Author(s):G.-R. A.-K. Guseinov
Index of UDK:811.512.144`282.3`342
Index of DOI:10.37972/chgpu.2021.112.3.003
Name of article:PHONETIC FEATURES OF THE KIZLYAR SUBDIALECT OF THE TEREK DIALECT OF THE KUMYK LANGUAGE IN THE COMPARATIVE-HISTORICAL AND AREAL CONTEXT
Keywords:

Kumyk language, Terek dialect, Kizlyar subdialect, areal, comparative-historical, context, Bulgarian and Chuvash languages

Abstracts:

The subject of the analysis is the phonetic system of the isolated Kizlyar (Kizlyar, Podgornoe and Maly Malgobek villages of North Ossetia-Alania) subdialect of the Terek dialect of the Kumyk language. This subdialect has not yet been the subject of special consideration, both with regard to its synchronous description and of the investigated relation. The purpose of this publication is a diachronically oriented analysis of the phonetic features of the Kizlyar subdialect in the wide areal and comparative-historical context of its relationship with other Kumyk dialects and other ancient and new Turkic languages, including Bulgar (Chuvash). Based on the provision on the primary localization of ancient Bulgarian dialects in the North Caucasus region, an earlier substrate origin of some phonetic (vocal and consonant) features of this dialect were established than in Chuvash. They, together with some other Kumyk dialects and partly Karachay-Balkarian subdialects, can go back to the ancient Bulgarian dialects of the North Caucasus and Dagestan. As a result of the early medieval and subsequent migration of their speakers to the Volga region, these features were deposited in the Chuvash language at various stages of its prehistory and history. In the subdialect, separate, possibly later features are also found, obligated by their origin to areally adjacent Turkic languages.

The contact details of authors:

Гусейнов Гарун-Рашид Абдул-Кадырович – доктор филологических наук, профессор кафедры русского языка Дагестанского государственного университета, г. Махачкала, Россия; e-mail: garun48@mail.ru

Pages:18-24
Full version of article:Download