I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN

Phone: (8352) 62-08-71 ext. 1182, ext. 1184

redak_vestnik@chgpu.edu.ru

Index catalog Press of Russia: 39898

Metadata (abstracts and keywords) for the articles in the journal

I. V. Matveeva, Yu. N. Zintsova, S. N. Samozhenov THE PROBLEM OF NOMINATION OF THE SUBJECTS OF SPEECH THROUGH NARRATOLOGY PRISM (ON THE MATERIAL FROM “MIRROR STORY” BY ILSE AICHINGER) // I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN. 2021. № 2(111). p. 109-115
Author(s):I. V. Matveeva, Yu. N. Zintsova, S. N. Samozhenov
Index of UDK:811.112.2’37:82-32Айхингер
Index of DOI:10.37972/chgpu.2021.111.2.013
Name of article:THE PROBLEM OF NOMINATION OF THE SUBJECTS OF SPEECH THROUGH NARRATOLOGY PRISM (ON THE MATERIAL FROM “MIRROR STORY” BY ILSE AICHINGER)
Keywords:

category of personality, functional-semantic field, personality, interaction, mirror symbolism

Abstracts:

This article deals with the communicative-pragmatic potential of the field of the personality through the prism of the literary work “Mirror Story” by the Austrian authoress I. Aichinger. The communicative space in the novel is revealed through mirror symbolism. The distribution of roles between the participants in the communicative process occurs precisely through the mirror perspective. The speaker’s sphere is represented by the personal pronoun ich, as well as by the pronouns du, ihr in their secondary nomination. The analysis of the communicative-pragmatic potential of the “I”-subject in a narrative context showed the ability of the units of the functional-semantic field of the personality to express the attitude of the subject of speech to the subjects of the communicative situation. In this way the speaker in the process of interaction can “take the role of another” and assume how he was perceived by a recipient. These transpositions of communicative pronoun forms have not only new meaning, but also allow us to reflect new unexpected connotations, like the interactive relations of specific communicants. All this indicate the polysemancy of such a philosophical model of communication, in which not only the speaker, recipient and non-participant in communication are present, but also the over-recipient.

The contact details of authors:

Матвеева Ирина Владимировна – кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры теории и практики немецкого языка Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета им. Н. А. Добролюбова, г. Нижний Новгород, Россия; e-mail: Iramatweewa@yandex.ru

Зинцова Юлия Николаевна – кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры теории и практики немецкого языка Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета им. Н. А. Добролюбова, г. Нижний Новгород, Россия; e-mail: zintsova@mail.ru

Саможенов Сергей Николаевич – кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры теории и практики немецкого языка Нижегородского государственного лингвистического университета им. Н. А. Добролюбова, г. Нижний Новгород, Россия; e-mail: sesam2301@yandex.ru

Pages:109-115
Full version of article:Download