Metadata (abstracts and keywords) for the articles in the journal
S. L. Yakovleva METAPHORICAL MODELS OF THE CONCEPTUAL SPHERE «GRATITUDE» IN RUSSIAN PAROEMIC DISCOURCE // I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN. 2020. № 3(108). p. 133-141
Author(s):
S. L. Yakovleva
Index of UDK:
811.161.1'373.612.2’42
Index of DOI:
10.37972/chgpu.2020.108.3.015
Name of article:
METAPHORICAL MODELS OF THE CONCEPTUAL SPHERE «GRATITUDE» IN RUSSIAN PAROEMIC DISCOURCE
Keywords:
metaphorical model, gratitude, philosophy of gratitude, psychology of gratitude, paremia, discourse, subspheres «Man», «Nature», «Artifact», «Socium», frame, slot
Abstracts:
The article considers the semantic and contextual analysis of Russian paroemic units verbalizing a conceptual sphere Gratitude. The units were selected from the book of proverbs by V. Dahl. This conceptual sphere is important to reveal characteristic features of basic concepts in Russian linguoculture. The formation of this feeling and emotion contributes to the development of social empathy, creation of moral values in society. The analysis of the phenomenon of gratitude reflected in the archaic consciousness of Russian people helps to observe its transformation in social continuum.
The article considers some philosophical and psychological aspects of gratitude in Russian archaic consciousness, basic metaphorization subspheres, their frame structures and slots; reveals metaphorical models of subspheres Man, Nature, Artifact, Socium. The subsphere Man is represented by the metaphorical models Human Body and Actions Performed by Man. Metaphorical models of the subsphere Nature contain Flora World, Fauna World and Celestial Bodies. Frame structures of the subsphere Socium are verbalized by the slots connected with religion and penitentiary institutions. The subsphere Artifacts is represented by the models Food and Drinks, Clothes, Money, Fabrics, Instruments.
The group of anthropomorphical metaphors is the largest one containing 38 units (41,8 %); the second one is the group of artifact metaphors with 31 units (34 %); the third place is taken by phytomorphical metaphors – 14 units (15,4 %) and sociomorphical group is the last one with 8 units (8,8 %).
The contact details of authors:
Яковлева Светлана Леонидовна – кандидат педагогических наук, доцент, магистр лингвистики, доцент кафедры иностранных языков и перевода Казанского инновационного университета им. В. Г. Тимирясова, г. Казань, Россия, e-mail: zavkaf1@gmail.com
