Metadata (abstracts and keywords) for the articles in the journal
A. A. Talanina WAYS OF DENOTING THE SUBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC COGNITION IN A LECTURE // I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN. 2020. № 3(108). p. 84-94
Author(s):
A. A. Talanina
Index of UDK:
81’42:001.4
Index of DOI:
10.37972/chgpu.2020.31.52.001
Name of article:
WAYS OF DENOTING THE SUBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC COGNITION IN A LECTURE
Keywords:
subject of scientific cognition, genre, lecture, epideictic, scientific image of the universe
Abstracts:
This paper analyzes the features of references to the subjects of scientific cognition in the genre of lecture as one of the components of the scientific image of the universe of the future researcher. The subjects of scientific cognition, notably researchers or research groups and communities, form a certain hierarchy within the framework of the scientific image of the universe. The relevance of studying the functions of these units within linguistics is determined by the importance of this knowledge to navigate through the scientific world. The analysis of lectures in various disciplines (logics, neurolinguistics, philosophy, physics, etc.) made it possible to distinguish two types of reference to the subject of scientific cognition: concretized and generalized, this classification is based on the specific features of their linguistic explication through the lecture. The most common type of reference is the indication of a specific subject of scientific cognition, the main purpose of which is to provide a positive assessment using descriptive components (descriptions). The study revealed three types of descriptions: direct positive assessment, an indication of the subject’s status in the scientific image of the world and its contribution to science, as well as representations of subjects as already familiar to listeners. A direct positive assessment of the subject of scientific cognition, whose authority is indisputable for the scientific community, is expressed using contextually independent definitions, while the indication to the scientists whose views are not generally accepted includes contextually dependent definitions that do not indicate absolutely positive rating. A detailed analysis of the ways of designating the subjects of scientific cognition in a lecture makes it possible to provide a detailed description of factors that influence the creation of a system of scientific authority figures.
The contact details of authors:
Таланина Александра Андреевна – аспирант кафедры русского языка и литературы Санкт-Петербургского горного университета, г. Санкт-Петербург, Россия; e-mail: talanina_a@mail.ru
