I. YAKOVLEV CHUVASH STATE PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY BULLETIN

text, secondary text, educational text, essay, lacuna, meaningful lacuna, conceptual lacuna, lacunarity

The article examines secondary educational texts offered to school leavers at the Unified State Exam in Russian Language. These texts are secondary, since they are selected and constructed according to certain structural and content parameters, always rely on the author’s artistic and journalistic works, undergo various transformations and change their function (for example, from the original aesthetic to an educational, didactic function). At the same time, there is currently no complete and systematic description of this genre of educational texts from the standpoint of secondariness in linguistics, which determines the relevance of this work. Contextual analysis of the texts presented in the Unified State Exam the Russian Language in different years and based on the primary works of N. A. Varentsov, Yu.M. Nagibin, V. F. Tendryakov, A. P. Chekhov, E. Yu. Shim, M. A. Sholokhov revealed semantic and conceptual lacunas in them, that is, sections of such textual information, which is significant in the hermeneutical and interpretative aspect, is potentially semantically insufficient and needs to be eliminated. At the same time, such lacunas create tangible difficulties for students in understanding the content of the secondary text as a result of omissions of significant sections of the author’s text, crucial for the plot, and the presence of lacunary concepts or alogisms that prevent adequate interpretation of the text. The author considers the elimination of such lacunas that create real obstacles in the interpretation of texts proposed at the final state exam to be an important task.

Буданова Светлана Геннадьевна – кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры современного русского языка Кубанского государственного университета, г. Краснодар, Россия, https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8379-1619, sgbudanova@mail.ru